Wednesday, 11 June 2025

Connecting Granular Space to Nested Fields

Connecting Granular Space to Nested Fields

Author: Jim Redgewell
Date: June 2025
References:


Author's Note:
While this paper draws conceptual connections between my Nested Field Theory and Sky Darmos’s granular space framework, it is important to clarify that Sky Darmos does not currently endorse or support the Nested Field Theory.


Abstract

This paper explores a conceptual link between two emerging frameworks in theoretical physics: Sky Darmos's model of granular space from Space-Particle Dualism (SPD), and Jim Redgewell's Nested Field Theory. Darmos proposes that space is made up of discrete, oscillating units whose density determines gravitational strength. Redgewell, by contrast, proposes a layered structure of fields nested within one another, accounting for interactions and coherence across different forces. We argue that granular space density can serve as the foundational mechanism behind nested field structuring.


1. Introduction

Modern physics is increasingly pointing toward the idea that spacetime is not smooth, but discrete or quantized at a fundamental level. Sky Darmos's SPD theory represents one of the boldest articulations of this view, proposing that gravitational force emerges from the density of granular units of space. Simultaneously, Nested Field Theory suggests that fields—from electromagnetic to gravitational—are not independent entities but rather structured layers embedded within one another.

This paper proposes a unification of these ideas: the density of granular space may determine the architecture and activation of nested fields.


2. Granular Space in SPD Theory

Sky Darmos's theory of Space-Particle Dualism asserts that each baryonic particle is associated with a localized oscillating space quantum. These granular units collectively define the texture of space. In his model, the effective gravitational constant, GG, varies depending on the material composition of interacting bodies due to differences in baryon density. This has led to experimental predictions and data analysis showing composition-dependent values of GG.

Rather than treating GG as a universal constant, Darmos suggests it reflects the local configuration of granular space. A higher density of space particles or greater connectivity results in stronger effective gravitational interaction.


3. Nested Fields in Redgewell's Theory

Nested Field Theory proposes that fundamental forces are layered phenomena, with fields embedded within higher-order fields. For example, the electric field may be nested within a magnetic or Higgs-like field, and so on. This structure allows for coherence, synchronization, and energy transfer across scales, resembling a fractal or Russian-doll-like configuration.

In this view, particles are not isolated point objects but field resonances sustained by nested layers of oscillating field interactions. Synchronization across these layers governs observed properties such as mass, charge, and spin.


4. Linking Granular Density to Field Nesting

The hypothesis put forward here is that granular space density sets the stage for nested field formation. Several connections support this idea:

  • Structural Support: Just as denser materials support more complex architectures, denser regions of granular space may allow for more layers of fields to be nested and stabilized.

  • Energy Bandwidth: Granular density might determine the "bandwidth" of the vacuum—higher density supports higher-frequency, finer-scale field interactions.

  • Dynamic Layer Activation: Changes in granular space density (due to energy, mass, or composition) might trigger transitions between nested field states, akin to phase transitions.

In this sense, the granular texture of space is not just a backdrop but a field-generating mechanism.


5. Implications for Gravity and Unification

By framing gravity as a function of granular space density and nested fields as emergent from that same structure, we may begin to bridge the conceptual gap between quantum field theory and gravity.

This leads to a potential reinterpretation of the gravitational field as not merely curvature, but as a synchronization of nested field states across varying granular densities. Gravity, in this unified view, becomes a coherence-enforcing field rather than a purely geometric deformation.


6. Future Directions

  1. Mathematical Formalization: Develop equations linking granular density with the number and type of active nested field layers.

  2. Experimental Correlation: Investigate whether known variations in GG correspond with predicted field layer shifts.

  3. Cosmological Modeling: Explore how granular density variations in the early universe might have seeded the nested field structures that define modern particles and forces.


Conclusion

Sky Darmos’s granular space and Jim Redgewell’s nested field theory offer complementary insights into the nature of fields, particles, and gravity. This paper proposes that granular space density is not merely a gravitational factor but the very foundation upon which nested fields emerge and operate. This connection opens a promising path toward a unified field framework grounded in physical structure and field synchronization.


References:

1 comment:

  1. Correct: Sky Darmos' theory of Space Particle Dualism asserts that every particle is a quantum of space, which is a complex number 2-sphere where the surface area is a complex number z that goes around the origin of the complex plane. These space quanta overlap to form an emergent granular space that feels almost three-dimensional, even though all particles always move on 2D surfaces.

    According to SPD-quantum gravity, the gravity per quark or per baryon (proton or neutron) is always constant, which is why the gravity per kilogram is not constant, but depends on the chemical composition. Nuclear binding energy is negative and therefore reduces mass (mass is a form of energy). That is what makes mass and particle count very different.

    This has led to experimental predictions and data analysis showing composition-dependent variations of big-G.

    Because Darmos does not believe that gravity comes from mass, he does not treat big-G, which is the gravity per kilogram, as a universal constant, but as a parameter that changes as the mass per baryon changes.

    The high density of space quanta in empty space is why additional space quanta from gauge bosons do not increase gravity by much, explaining why gravity is such a weak force. On Earth there are both the space quanta from the quantum vacuum and the space quanta from Earth's gravitational field, making the gravity between objects on Earth even weaker. This uniform change in the strength of gravity is like a change in the constants of nature and it therefore manifests as a Lorenz transformation, meaning that time slows down.

    A higher density of space quanta results both in time dilation and greater freefall acceleration.

    ReplyDelete