Sunday, 27 April 2025

Super-Delayed Quantum Eraser

 

Super-Delayed Quantum Eraser: A Clear and Simple Explanation

Introduction

This article provides a crystal-clear explanation of the Super-Delayed Quantum Eraser Thought Experiment, designed to test the predictions of standard quantum mechanics against those of Nested Field Theory. The goal is to make the experimental logic accessible and unambiguous to readers at all levels.

Purpose of the Experiment

The Super-Delayed Quantum Eraser tests whether quantum entanglement and interference patterns can survive long delays. It seeks to determine if deeper, hidden field structures (as proposed in Nested Field Theory) maintain coherence beyond the limits predicted by standard quantum mechanics.

Setup of the Experiment

  1. Create an entangled pair of photons:

    • Photon A and Photon B are generated together and are quantum entangled.

  2. Send Photon A toward a double-slit apparatus:

    • Photon A moves toward a barrier with two slits.

    • Photon A's associated field disturbance can pass through both slits, allowing for potential interference.

  3. Detect Photon A at a screen:

    • Photon A's impact point on the detection screen is recorded.

    • We save the data but do not analyze or categorize it yet.

  4. Photon B is delayed:

    • Photon B is sent a long distance away or stored in a way that its measurement is delayed for a significant time (minutes, hours, or longer).

  5. Later, measure Photon B in one of two ways:

    • Choice 1: Preserve which-path information: Measure Photon B to determine which slit Photon A went through.

    • Choice 2: Erase which-path information: Measure Photon B in a way that erases the knowledge of which slit Photon A used.

  6. Analyze Photon A's detection pattern:

    • Only after the delayed measurement of Photon B do we examine the recorded data of Photon A.

Predictions Based on the Measurement Choice

Measurement on Photon BResult on Photon A
Preserve which-path informationNo interference pattern (two lumps)
Erase which-path informationInterference pattern (fringes and bands)

Important Point:

  • It does not matter how much time passes before we measure Photon B.

  • The deciding factor is whether the path information is preserved or erased, not the timing.

How Standard Quantum Mechanics and Nested Field Theory Differ

TheoryPrediction About Long Delays
Standard Quantum MechanicsEntanglement quickly decays due to environmental decoherence; after long delays, no interference pattern survives.
Nested Field TheoryEntanglement persists through deeper field structures; interference pattern can survive even after long delays, depending on how Photon B is measured.

Key Clarifications

  • If we know which slit the particle went through (path information is preserved), then there will be no interference pattern, even after a long delay.

  • If we do not know which slit (path information is erased), then the interference pattern can still appear, even after a long delay.

  • Time delay does not itself destroy interference — knowing or erasing the path information is what determines the outcome.

Simple Timeline of Events

  1. Entangled photons A and B are created.

  2. Photon A goes through the double slit and hits the screen; data is recorded.

  3. Long delay (minutes, hours, etc.).

  4. Photon B is measured:

    • Path known ➔ No interference.

    • Path erased ➔ Interference appears.

  5. Analyze Photon A's saved data to see the effect.

Conclusion

The Super-Delayed Quantum Eraser experiment offers a clear test between standard quantum mechanics and Nested Field Theory. In both theories, knowing which slit the particle traveled through will destroy the interference pattern. However, Nested Field Theory predicts that coherence, and thus the ability to produce an interference pattern, can survive much longer than standard quantum mechanics expects, because it is anchored in deeper, faster fields.

By designing this clear and simple experiment, we provide a practical way to test if deeper field structures exist and whether the speed of light is truly the ultimate limit for maintaining quantum coherence.

No comments:

Post a Comment